| Integrity Level | Typical Processes | Access to System | |----------------|------------------|------------------| | Low (SID: S-1-16-0x1000) | Sandboxed browsers, restricted tokens | Very limited | | Medium (SID: S-1-16-0x2000) | Standard user apps | User profile only | | High (SID: S-1-16-0x3000) | Admin processes with consent | System-wide | | System (SID: S-1-16-0x4000) | Kernel, services | Full control |
| Limitation | Impact | |------------|--------| | No stealth features | Logs events abundantly | | No persistence | Elevation lasts only for process lifetime | | Detected by all modern AVs as “RiskWare.UACBypass” | Cannot be used in live red team engagements without obfuscation | | Lacks modern bypasses (e.g., Cmstp , Fodhelper ) | Outdated for 2024+ threat landscape | | Console-only output | No GUI, less intuitive for non-technical demos | uac demo v1.0
Enter —a lightweight, often-misidentified executable that has quietly made rounds in security labs, GitHub repositories, and red-team toolkits. This article dissects UAC Demo v1.0: its purpose, its inner workings, its ethical use cases, and why version 1.0 remains a foundational tool for understanding Windows integrity levels. Part 1: What Is UAC Demo v1.0? Contrary to what the name might suggest, UAC Demo v1.0 is not an official Microsoft tool. It is a third-party, proof-of-concept (PoC) utility designed to demonstrate how UAC prompts can be triggered, bypassed, or manipulated. The “v1.0” designation indicates its status as an early, often open-source implementation—minimalist, functional, and educational. | Integrity Level | Typical Processes | Access